Yiming Dang vs Carolina Xavier Laydner Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 15 Jul at 04:21 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
Y. Dang vs C. Xavier Laydner

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

BRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Dang 1 - 0 Laydner
They have played 3 sets in total, with Yiming Dang winning 2 and Carolina Xavier Laydner winning 1. The last match between Yiming Dang and Carolina Xavier Laydner was at the W35 Sao Paulo, 15-07-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Yiming Dang getting the victory 7-5 3-6 10-6.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dang | 1 |
| Laydner | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W35 Sao Paulo(07-15-25)
Y. Dang vs C. X. Laydner H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 40.74% (44-64) | Career Total W/L | 50.00% (22-22) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
Y. Dang vs C. X. Laydner Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Recently, Laydner has secured 35.85% of points on their second serve, whereas Dang has a slightly stronger performance with 37.05%. Could this give Dang a slight edge?
- Return Game: Laydner has successfully won 50% of second serve return points, with Dang leading slightly at 52.32%. For first serve returns, Laydner and Dang are very close at 33.85% and 33.97%, respectively.
- Pressure Situations: Laydner has saved 35% of breakpoints, while Dang has showcased a better ability, saving 46.25%. Is Dang better under pressure?
- Overall Match Performance: Over the past year, Laydner has a 50% match win rate, contrasting with Dang's lower rate of 29.03%.
- Surface Preference: Laydner excels on indoor hard surfaces, achieving a 67% win rate, while Dang performs best on clay with a 50% win rate. Both struggle on their least favorite surfaces.
- Player Level: Competing at Challenger/ITF tournaments, Laydner won 54.55% of matches, whereas Dang won 27.78%. This could indicate Laydner's more consistent performance.
- Opponent Quality: Laydner's opponents have an average rank of 417.17, slightly lower than Dang’s, whose opponents are ranked on average 398.35.
- Deciding Sets: If the match reaches a deciding set, Laydner tends to perform better, winning 75% of such sets compared to Dang's 22%.
- Break Point Conversion: Laydner outshines with a 45.45% conversion rate, over Dang’s 39.82%, making Laydner more effective at seizing critical opportunities.
Editorial Prediction (July 15, 2025, UTC):
This matchup showcases two players with strengths in different areas. Despite Dang's slight edge in second serve points and pressure handling, Laydner shows consistent overall match performance and excels in break point conversions.
Furthermore, Laydner's prowess in deciding sets suggests a psychological advantage in crucial match moments.
Considering all these factors, Laydner appears to have a better chance at securing victory in the upcoming match. Laydner is favored to win.
Yiming Dang vs Carolina Xavier Laydner Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Y. Dang vs C. X. Laydner H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 20 | Games Won | 17 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:28:11 | Average Match Time | 2:28:11 |
| 51% (34/67) | 1st Serve % | 57% (48/84) |
| 56% (19/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (23/48) |
| 45% (15/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (18/36) |
| 36% (5/14) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (6/9) |
| 51% (43/84) | Return Points Win % | 49% (33/67) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
Y. Dang Recent Matches Played
C. X. Laydner Recent Matches Played

Y. Dang vs C. X. Laydner Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 40.74% (44/64) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (22/22) |
| 43.21% (105/138) | Sets Win/Loss | 48.04% (49/53) |
| 47.94% (1119/1215) | Games Win/Loss | 48.05% (457/494) |
| 41.67% (35/49) | Hard Win/Loss | 37.50% (3/5) |
| 53.85% (7/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 51.52% (17/16) |
| 18.18% (2/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 182 | Aces Total | 14 |
| 0.58 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 662 | Total Double Faults | 67 |
| 1:37:16 | Average Match Time | 1:12:17 |
| 406.16 | Average Opponent Rank | 352.75 |
| 56% (3664/6572) | 1st Serve % | 70% (1269/1808) |
| 60% (2200/3664) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (654/1269) |
| 40% (1171/2908) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (220/539) |
| 46% (385/846) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (110/227) |
| 46% (3019/6575) | Return Points Win % | 46% (825/1813) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43.75% (35/45) | Challenger W/L | 45.45% (10/12) |
| 34.62% (9/17) | Futures W/L | 54.55% (12/10) |
| 40% (42/104) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (22/44) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (14/31) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (3/7) |
| 38% (11/29) | Deciding Set Win % | 64% (9/14) |
| 80% (51/41) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (19/16) |
| 20% (51/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (19/3) |
| 5% (57/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (25/6) |